Thomas Aquinas--Aristotle--Rene Descartes--Epicurus--Martin Heidegger--Thomas Hobbes--David Hume--Immanuel Kant--Soren Kierkegaard--Karl Marx--John Stuart Mill--Friedrich Nietzsche--Plato--Karl Popper--Bertrand Russell--Jean-Paul Sartre--Arthur Schopenhauer--Socrates--Baruch Spinoza--Ludwig Wittgenstein

Thursday 25 October 2012

OBAMA VS ROMNEY DEBATE 3



This was a largely disappointing 3rd round of presidential debate.  It did not look like 2 candidates trying their best to leave a lasting impression before the actual voting.  There were no sparks, no real edge to their arguments and even less commitment.  It appeared that both were trying to play it safe. But, it told us what we already know - Obama is by far the better speaker and has the advantage of on-the-job experience for the last 4 years.  The only thing working against him is the not-so-rosy economic data.

Romney, on the other hand, appeared unsure and lacking in fresh ideas regarding foreign policy.  His lack of confidence and experience showed up when he seemed to trip up at the beginning of each sentence.  He was only in his element when he strayed into talking about his economic plans and his business acumen.

So, the verdict of this presidential election hinges on the mood of the electorate, whether a change in direction in the economic policies is desired and whether they are ready to bet on a relative newcomer or stay the course and continue with their faith in Obama.

Thursday 18 October 2012

OBAMA VS ROMNEY 2012 - a Singaporean's opinion

 
First Presidential Debate
 An aggressive Romney focused on the poor economic performance in the US over the last four years.  A strangely inhibited Obama failed to convincingly discredit Romney's plans.

 
Vice-Presidential Debate
Biden's arrogance was a turn-off in contrast to Ryan's creditably cool, calm and respectful demeanor.

 
Second Presidential Debate
Many analysts gave this round to Obama.  But, Romney's clear listing of Obama's poor economic record, strong stand on China's unfair trade practices, successful attack on Obama's anti-oil, coal, and gas policies and his explanation of how a tax cut and a balanced budget can co-exist if the economy expands; are all good substantial arguments.  On the other hand, Obama sounds rather nasty and quarrelsome; and nobody remembers what he really said about his plans for the next 4 years  The incumbent's reiterating of Romney's "47%" off-the-record gaffe, his successful brow-beating of Romney into backing down on the Benghazi issue, and the moderator's poorly disguised favoritism towards the president suggest that the Obama camp now appears to be a little desperate.  If the President had won this second debate, it is more down to style and experience than anything else.

How this presidential campaign is unfolding comes as a big surprise to me.  I would never have imagined that wooden Romney is now having the upper hand over slick Obama and he seems destined to score an upset victory come November!

Wednesday 10 October 2012

A REVOLUTIONARY FOOD TRAY RETURN PLAN


Despite much effort in the past, the unique problem of unreturned food trays in food centers remains unresolved in Singapore.

It's time for a fresh approach. I'm proposing a counter-intuitive solution. Instead of persuading reluctant people to return their trays after their meals, we should do just the opposite.  That is, we should tell people NOT to return their trays after eating!

This novel system works this way:  A diner eats his meal with all his food in a tray. He finishes his food, leaves his tray on the table and walks away.

When a second diner comes along and wishes to sit at the same table, he has to clear that tray away lest he has nowhere to put his food later. In so doing, he also reserves the table for himself. A cleaner, now re-designated  a tray manager,  puts a numbered reservation sign on the table for him. 

After returning the tray to a tray-return station, the second diner then proceeds to get his food and returns to eat at his table. When he finishes his food, he can just walk away. 

The process then repeats itself.  In effect, every diner will return one tray during the meal experience, though the tray returned is not his own. A diner has the option of refusing to clear the tray on approaching a table, but he will have to pay a $2 tip on the spot to the tray manager who will gladly do it for him with a wide smile! 

This system has several advantages.  

First, one way or another, all food trays will be cleared eventually since every diner will clear away one tray. There is no need to broadcast reminders through speakers as clearing trays become a systemic obligation. 

Second, the problem of a tight labour market for cleaners can be overcome as fewer cleaners or tray managers need to be deployed. The incorporation of tips in the system may also motivate more people to join the cleaning industry.  

Third, clearing the trays for others gives people an uplifting feeling of pride that they are performing a useful service for others and for society at large.

Fourth, the immediate reward of an official table reservation in exchange for cooperation provides a positive psychological reinforcement to habitualize the practice.  By the way, this also solves the other perennial problem of people reserving tables with packets of tissue.

And last, over time, people will gradually learn the golden rule of caring for others in the same way that they expect others to care for them. Such an educative effect of 'love thy neighbor' may slowly spread by contagion to other areas of our lives.

This is an opportunity to trigger a general reawakening of our collective civic consciousness. Let us adopt this food tray initiative and start a social revolution!

Tuesday 2 October 2012

IF YOU EVER FEEL DOWN, LET THESE FAVORITE SONGS OF MINE CHEER YOU UP!

20 big ones from the wonderful 70s and 80s.